Semantic
RRRRR
each
HyperBinderComposable knowledge layer for agentic AI

██╗  ██╗██╗   ██╗██████╗ ███████╗██████╗ ██████╗ ██╗███╗   ██╗██████╗ ███████╗██████╗
██║  ██║╚██╗ ██╔╝██╔══██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗██╔══██╗██║████╗  ██║██╔══██╗██╔════╝██╔══██╗
███████║ ╚████╔╝ ██████╔╝█████╗  ██████╔╝██████╔╝██║██╔██╗ ██║██║  ██║█████╗  ██████╔╝
██╔══██║  ╚██╔╝  ██╔═══╝ ██╔══╝  ██╔══██╗██╔══██╗██║██║╚██╗██║██║  ██║██╔══╝  ██╔══██╗
██║  ██║   ██║   ██║     ███████╗██║  ██║██████╔╝██║██║ ╚████║██████╔╝███████╗██║  ██║
╚═╝  ╚═╝   ╚═╝   ╚═╝     ╚══════╝╚═╝  ╚═╝╚═════╝ ╚═╝╚═╝  ╚═══╝╚═════╝ ╚══════╝╚═╝  ╚═╝

The missing knowledge layer between your data and your agent

Prompt dumps just aren't cutting it. Context should be organized into a logical world model. Hyperbinder gives you the tools to build genuine cognitive architectures for agents without the infrastructure mess (or costs).

Agentic knowledge designOne query: exact + semantic + graphTraceable reasoning paths

The cost of flat context

Your agent has context, but no structure. It can't distinguish "flights from NYC to LA" from "flights from LA to NYC" because both reduce to the same embedding. It can't tell which field matched or why.

So you build workarounds: metadata filters, re-ranking, a graph database for the relationships that embeddings can't capture. Each patch adds complexity without adding understanding.

HyperBinder encodes structure directly into the vector, so your agent doesn't just receive context. It reasons over a world model where order, type, and relationship are all preserved.

Beyond prompts

Dumping prompts (memory.md, etc) into the context window and hoping the agent makes sense of it is crude at best. Organize your context to mirror the logic of your domain.

YOUR QUERY

"Find AI startups acquired by enterprise companies in 2024"

DECOMPOSE
WHAT HYPERBINDER SEES
enterpriseSUBJECTsemantic
acquisitionPREDICATEexact
AI startupOBJECTsemantic
2024TIMEtemporal
GraphTraverse subject → predicate → object
~
VectorSemantic similarity on meaning-rich slots
=
RelationalExact filters, typed fields, joins
TemporalTime-based queries and constraints

The structure lives in the vector itself. Decomposition, filtering, and traversal all fall out naturally from the representation.

Three pillars

1) Compose knowledge

Define how concepts relate, which fields are semantic vs exact, and what structure queries can exploit.

  • Define semantic vs exact fields
  • Bind concepts into hyperdimensional vectors
  • Preserve relational structure
  • Schema as cognitive architecture
from hyperbinderimport HyperBinder, Triple, Field, Encoding

hb = HyperBinder(local=True)

# Define a knowledge graph schema for M&A deals
deal = Triple(
  subject=Field("acquirer", Encoding.SEMANTIC),
  predicate=Field("deal_type", Encoding.EXACT),
  object=Field("target", Encoding.SEMANTIC),
)

# Ingest data with your schema - collection is created automatically
hb.ingest(deals_df, collection="deals", schema=deal)

Think of it less as configuring a database and more as designing how your agent thinks.

2) Reason by structure + meaning

Combine precise filters, semantic search, and slot-targeted reasoning in a single query.

  • Combine exact filters + semantic search
  • Target specific slots for precision
  • Multi-slot compositional queries
  • One query, multiple reasoning modes
# Exact filter + slot-specific semantic search
results = (hb.query("deals", schema=deal)
  # exact match
  .filter(deal_type="acquisition")
  # semantic on target slot
  .search("AI startup", slot="target")
  # semantic on subject
  .search("strategic expansion", slot="subject")
  .top(10))

# Or use multi-slot semantic search
results = hb.query("deals", schema=deal).search_slots({
  "target": "AI startup",
  "subject": "enterprise company"
})

"Semantic search" becomes controllable: you decide which slots participate.

3) Trace & govern inference

Debug why something matched in terms your team understands—mapped to your schema instead of black-box scores.

  • See which fields matched and why
  • Similarity scores mapped to schema
  • Audit trail in business terms
  • Debug reasoning, not black boxes
Query: "AI acquisitions by enterprise companies"

312 semantic matches on deal_type ~= "acquisition"
89 where target.industry = "AI"          (slot: object)
34 where acquirer.segment = "enterprise" (slot: subject)
→ Top 10 by deal_size                      (slot: metadata.deal_size)

Retrieved: Acme → acquired → NeuralTech (2024, $2.1B)
├── acquirer: "Acme Corp"   (similarity: 0.91 to "enterprise")
├── target:  "NeuralTech"   (similarity: 0.94 to "AI startup")
└── rationale: "strategic AI capability expansion"

The "why" layer that RAG has always been missing.

What you stop building

Most AI infrastructure exists to work around flat embeddings. Once your vectors carry structure, that infrastructure becomes unnecessary.

Eliminated

The chunking pipeline you keep re-tuning

Schema-aware encoding means you stop guessing at chunk boundaries and hoping similarity search respects meaning. The structure is already in the encoding.

Eliminated

The graph database you spun up for one join

Relationships live in the same vector space as everything else. You traverse them algebraically, in the same system that handles search.

Eliminated

The post-filter that silently drops good results

Exact filters, semantic search, and joins all operate on the same representation in one query. Nothing gets lost between stages.

Built for performance at every layer

A native compiled engine built from scratch. Everything runs in the hot path, nothing is bolted on.

O(1) containment queries

Membership tests resolve in 0.2ms, exact lookups in 0.025ms. Your latency budget goes to the work that matters.

98% candidate pruning

Smart indexing eliminates 98% of candidates before scoring begins. Index builds in 11ms at 50K rows.

One pipeline, zero drift

Ingest, search, update, and traversal all share the same encoding path, so nothing drifts out of sync.

Constant memory footprint

Each field is sized to its actual information content, so memory scales with what you store rather than what you allocate.

No garbage collection pauses

Compiled native code with deterministic memory management. Your hot path never stalls for garbage collection.

Use cases

Agent cognitive models

Give your agent a structured world model with memory (episodic, semantic, procedural), goal hierarchies, and domain knowledge that all cross-reference in one system.

Enterprise RAG with governance

Query policies, contracts, and product docs by structure and meaning, with every answer traceable to source facts.

Semantic caching

Cache LLM responses by meaning instead of string match. A single schema does the work of an entire intent-classification and entity-extraction pipeline.

Knowledge graphs without a graph database

Store and traverse relationships algebraically in the same system you already use. You get graph capabilities without running a separate graph database.

This is just scratching the surface. HyperBinder provides the primitives to model a vast range of domains and use cases. Organize your context how it is organized in real life: hierarchies, sequences, networks, and more.

Does this sound like you?

"My agent keeps hallucinating"

HyperBinder derives answers from ingested facts. If something can't be traced back to what you put in, it doesn't come out.

"I can't debug why RAG returned that result"

Every answer shows which fields matched and why, in your schema's terms.

"My compliance team won't approve black-box AI"

Every answer comes with a full audit trail showing the entities, relations, similarity scores, and inference paths that produced it.

HyperBinder is in private beta. We're working with teams building agent memory, enterprise RAG, and knowledge-grounded reasoning systems.

Your AI stack has a gap between data you trust and answers you trust. Better tools won't close it. A better representation will.